FATF can salvage its counter-terrorism credentials by cracking down on Pakistan – Firstpost
With the second meeting of the FATF scheduled to commence today, countries interested in the fight against terrorism and its financing need to re-evaluate Pakistan’s role in failing to crack down on terrorism from its soil
read more
Should the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) take a sharper and closer look at Pakistan’s counter-terrorism reality? With the second meeting of the FATF scheduled to commence on 10 June 2025, like-minded countries invested in the fight against terrorism and its financing need to re-evaluate Pakistan’s role in failing to crack down on terrorism from its soil.
Pakistan has thrice been listed on FATF’s Grey List in the past, from 2008-2010, 2012-2015 and 2018-2022. The third time around, it landed on the list after the motion was initiated by the United States and supported by the United Kingdom, France and Germany due to Pakistan’s glaring deficiencies in counter-terrorist financing (CFT).
The recent events around the conduct of Operation Sindoor are a stark reality check on the complicity of the Pakistani state in supporting, funding and participating in terrorism. If the world needed any further proof, Pakistan did not hesitate to provide it in full glare of the world media. Shortly after the successful precision strikes, senior military commanders stood in solidarity at the funeral prayer meeting, led by Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) terrorist commander Hafiz Abdul Rauf. Pakistani military personnel went a step further by carrying the coffins of terrorists to reinforce their support and backing for UN-proscribed terrorist groups and their leaders.
Terrorist leaders from the LeT and JuD have since been seen openly galvanising support for terrorism from Pakistan and collecting funds to provide an impetus to their “jihad”. The Pakistani “establishment” and terrorist handlers are confident that, having escaped the FATF clutches, they can continue to support terrorism as a state policy.
Pakistan has been at pains to highlight Kashmir as the point of contention with India. On the contrary, it is Pakistan’s employment of terrorism as an instrument of hybrid war that should remain the focus of attention of world capitals. And the best way to curb Pakistani adventurism is to retain strict control over the proliferation of terrorism by organisations like the FATF. There is no better way to ensure stability in the region and restrict the export from the terrorism factory of the world, and curbing its funding.
The FATF is a 40-member, inter-governmental, multinational body that acts as a “watchdog” against money laundering and terrorist financing. India is a member of the grouping. The FATF sets standards to fight terrorist finance and, along with its affiliated bodies, evaluates member countries for their compliance with its guidelines. This includes technical compliance, such as the absence of or inadequacy of laws. More importantly, its focus on the effectiveness of implementation highlights weaknesses or, worse, wilful defiance of countries like Pakistan in fighting terrorism.
Pakistan’s last evaluation by the FATF was done in 2019. Its report was a national embarrassment for the country, at the very least. If Pakistan’s evaluation is compared to a student’s school report card, then, of the 11 effectiveness parameters, Pakistan failed in 10 and got a compartment in one! The rowdy kid’s abysmal report card was not a sign of inability or a lack of resources to study. It came from the confidence to successfully fool not only the class teacher but the entire school faculty.
This does not come as a surprise, given the country’s record of nurturing and sheltering UN proscribed terrorist groups and their commanders. The evaluation report noted that “Several UN-listed organisations continue to operate openly in Pakistan, including holding fundraising events.”
Pakistan has mastered the art of obfuscating reality and window dressing the true face of its parallel terror economy. The appeasement of major powers by handing over selective terrorist leaders and promising to safeguard economic interests like the CPEC corridor is not a guarantee against the spread of the contagion.
If the FATF does intend to expose Pakistan’s age-old strategy of running with the hares and hunting with the hounds, then its record of fighting terrorism deserves closer scrutiny. Member countries like the United States, the United Kingdom, France and Germany that have been victims of Pakistan’s terror factories should support India’s attempt at stabilising the region by curbing the funding of terrorism in Pakistan.
The international community must realise that the Pakistani establishment’s repeated claims of being a victim of terrorism are inherently flawed. It is not the West that is responsible for Pakistan’s terror woes, unlike Defence Minister Khawaja Asif’s repeated assertions. It is Pakistan’s strategy of promoting extremist thought and sowing jihadi ideology that is hollowing its social fabric.
Pakistan has been fooling the world by selectively fighting terrorism and equally selectively sharing figures of terrorists prosecuted and acted against. If this continues, little change can be expected. It is time to reintroduce the motion in the FATF to at least place Pakistan on the Grey List. This is despite the reality of mirror, mirror on the wall, who is the blackest of them all? Pakistan.
Col Vivek Chadha (Retd) is a Senior Fellow at Manohar Parrikar IDSA. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost’s views.
Post Comment