How Pakistan’s violence, apathy pushed Balochistan to brink – Firstpost

On March 11, while the Jaffar Express, a train that travels once a week from Quetta to Peshawar, was travelling through the rugged mountains of Balochistan, it suddenly came under attack in the Bolan Pass. Amongst its passengers were military personnel of 12 Corps and Pakistan’s prestigious Staff College, who apparently travel in civilian clothes for fear of being targeted.

Members of the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) exploded an IED and brought the train to a halt before storming the carriages and taking passengers hostage. Thereafter, Pakistan’s security forces were locked in a tense standoff with the terrorists in one of the most brazen attacks Pakistan has ever witnessed.

Under Operation Green Bolan, which lasted over 36 hours, Pakistan’s military’s media wing claimed that 354 hostages had been rescued while 33 terrorists involved in the attack were killed. However, 26 hostages lost their lives, including 18 military and Frontier Corps personnel, three railway employees, and five civilians.

The casualty count could rise, as 37 of the rescued hostages sustained injuries and are being treated at hospitals, according to Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) Director General Lt Gen Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry.

As per their reports, the hostages were released in three phases: first, a group of Baloch locals was freed by the terrorists after ethnic profiling, in what the Director General of ISPR termed a “deceptive perception manoeuvre”.

The second group escaped when Frontier Corps snipers created an opportunity for them to flee, although a couple of passengers lost their lives when terrorists fired at them.

The third and final group was rescued during the clearance operation by the Special Services Group (SSG), which successfully neutralised the remaining terrorists aboard the train. No hostages were killed during the final assault, he said.

Then again, on March 16, Baloch insurgents attacked a military convoy in Pakistan; as per the BLA, as many as 90 military personnel were killed in this attack.

The Global Terrorism Index (GTI) 2025 now ranks Pakistan as the world’s second most terrorism-affected country, after Burkina Faso. According to the report, terrorism-related deaths surged by 45 per cent in 2024 to 1,081, while attacks more than doubled from 517 to 1,099.

Groups such as the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and separatist outfits such as the BLA have intensified their campaigns, exploiting the nation’s deepening economic instability and political turmoil following the ouster of former premier Imran Khan in 2022.

The fall of Kabul in 2021 and the subsequent return of the Taliban to Afghanistan have emboldened terror outfits, including the TTP, while also fuelling violence from the Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISKP). At the same time, Pakistan’s growing alliance with China has strained its relations with the US, leading to a decline in American support.

Recent Incidents

However, this is no isolated incident, with several others standing out for their scale, sophistication and lethality. The escalating insurgency has exposed Pakistan’s weakening grip over its restive provinces of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan, as both terrorists and separatist groups grow bolder.

On March 4, two suicide bombers affiliated with the Hafiz Gul Bahadur group, a North Waziristan-based terror outfit, drove vehicles packed with explosives into a military base in KP’s Bannu District. The attackers subsequently stormed the compound, resulting in at least eighteen deaths, including five soldiers, and numerous injuries. A day earlier, on March 3, a female suicide bomber of the BLA targeted a security forces’ convoy in Balochistan’s Kalat, leading to the death of a paramilitary soldier and injuring four others.

Before that, the Baloch Raji Aajoi Sangar (BRAS), an umbrella grouping of Baloch insurgent organisations, announced plans to “intensify the blockade on all important highways of Balochistan to disrupt the logistical, economic, and military interests of the state”.

Last month, a suicide bombing targeted a mosque within the Darul Uloom Haqqania seminary in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa’s Nowshera District, an institution historically linked to the Taliban leadership in Afghanistan. The attack killed six, including the seminary’s vice principal and former senator Maulana Hamidul Haq. On February 19, seven labourers hailing from Punjab were killed aboard a bus en route to Lahore.

These are some of the major incidents that made headlines in the last month alone, which reflect the evolving tactics of terror outfits, their growing brazenness, and their increasing operational capabilities.

Baloch groups, particularly the BLA and Baloch Liberation Front (BLF), have significantly escalated their insurgency in 2024, targeting Pakistani security forces, infrastructure, and foreign investments. Their operations have intensified, with attacks surging from 116 in 2023 to 504 in 2024, while deaths quadrupled from 88 to 388, according to the terrorism index.

The Usual Statements

A day after the hijacking of the Jaffar Express ended , Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif went to Quetta to take stock of matters he reiterated the need for national unity at this time of crisis, and acknowledged that the lack of development in Balochistan was an obstacle to eliminating terrorism. The Foreign Office, meanwhile, reaffirmed the military’s earlier assertion that the train hijacking had been coordinated from Afghanistan, while notoriously adding that “India is … sponsoring terrorism” in Pakistan, which New Delhi rightly rejected as a claim without any proof and asked Islamabad to introspect.

Earlier, Pakistan had repeatedly been raising concerns about the Afghan Taliban’s lack of action regarding Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP) sanctuaries in Afghanistan. Now, it feels that BLA terrorists are being allowed to entrench themselves across the border and plan attacks on Pakistan. The Pakistani government blaming the Taliban has stated that unless action is taken against all anti-Pakistan terrorists on Afghan soil, bilateral ties will not improve.

Relations between Pakistan and Afghanistan have been strained due to frequent border skirmishes and Islamabad repeatedly demanding that Kabul take action against the banned TTP for using Afghan soil to launch attacks in Pakistan. Kabul denies the allegations. Though there is no doubt the pullout of the US from Afghanistan has resulted in weapons falling into the hands of these groups.

Speaking during the UN Security Council (UNSC) on 14 March, Pakistan’s Permanent Representative to the UN Ambassador Munir Akram stated: “Pakistan will continue to take all necessary measures to eliminate the terrorist threats to our national security in accordance with our right to self-defence.”

Akram said that the Taliban had “failed to address the threat posed to the region and beyond by other terrorist groups, such as Al-Qaeda, the TTP and Baloch terrorists, including the BLA and the Majeed Brigade, which are present in Afghanistan”. “The TTP also receives external support and financing from our principal adversary,” the envoy said in an apparent reference to India, again a move by Pakistan to cover up its own failures.

Lt Gen Sharif, the DG ISPR, linked the attack to Afghanistan, stating that the hijackers were in constant communication with their handlers across the border but also said that “in this terrorist incident in Balochistan, and others before, the main sponsor is your eastern neighbour”. He, of course, offered no proof to support the accusation.

The Indian government has categorically rejected Pakistan’s allegations. “We reject the baseless accusations made by Pakistan. The whole world knows where the epicentre of global terrorism is. Pakistan should look within itself instead of blaming others for its internal problems and failures,” Indian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said.

Afghanistan also denied any connection between the attackers and its territory. “Pakistan should focus on its security and resolving its internal issues instead of making irresponsible statements,” a statement from Kabul read.

What Fuelled the Growth of Baloch Militancy

While there is unanimity regarding the state’s right to the use of force to fight terrorism. But there is also a need to look at the roots of the political unrest that feeds insurgency.

Pakistan has failed to address the true needs and aspirations of the tribal population. A lack of genuine engagement led to the rise of additional armed separatist groups, which now not only target Pakistani security forces and Chinese interests but also attack migrant workers.

In fact, the increasing alienation of the population due to deprivation of democratic and economic rights, use of force to suppress protests and growing incidents of enforced disappearances has fuelled anger, particularly among the youth. This has provided the separatist groups with increasing sympathisers and recruits. There is no doubt that failure to address the genuine demands of the people has resulted in the rise of such attacks.

Tariq Khosa, a police officer who served in Balochistan and was the Director General of the Federal Investigation Agency, wrote an article on how state atrocities turned Dr Allah Nazar, a gold medallist from Bolan Medical College, into a dissident and the manner in which the leadership of Baloch dissidents passed on from tribal sardars like the Marris, Mengals and Bugtis to the lower-middle- and middle-class youth.

The policy of persecution turned a young doctor, Mahrang Baloch, whose father was murdered, into a leading human rights activist against alleged enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings. Her increasingly vocal Baloch rights-based movement, the Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC or Baloch Unity Committee), comprising mainly of women activists, is gaining in popularity. Opposing violence, she has said that “the solution to the Balochistan conundrum lies in the rule of law, which those in power don’t want because chaos strengthens their grip on power”.

Pakistan has a strange relationship with democracy, including foisting an unrepresentative government on its people. Mandates are denied, winners declared losers, and even court judgements are flouted to stop one party from gaining its rightful share. This is having an impact and leads to a strong sense of alienation.

It is apparent that the Baloch militants now seem to have a stronger support base that allows them to operate effectively. In June, Pakistan launched Operation Azm e Istehkam, a counterterrorism operation; the present violence is being seen as a retaliation. Pressing ahead with a militarised security approach to address the crisis is an indication that lessons from the past have not been learnt. Alienation and apathy from the state can lead to disastrous consequences.

Conclusion

With terror networks expanding and state authority eroding, Pakistan’s security challenges are reaching a breaking point. Pakistan, while feeling the pinch of terrorism in its west and making cliched and baseless statements alleging the role of India, has fuelled the terrorism in its eastern border with India in J&K and Punjab.

The question now is whether the government can reclaim control or whether the insurgency will further spiral out of hand. Instead of showing any empathy and compassion to the Baloch people, Pakistan has gone for a hammer-and-tongs approach.

While there is a visible security angle to the Balochistan crisis, at its heart it is a political problem, which needs a political solution. Anything that allows the ranks of separatists to increase as a result of recruiters exploiting state-created circumstances also needs to be addressed.

The current round of insurgency in Balochistan has raged for almost two decades and was triggered by the regime of General Pervez Musharraf, who had announced, ‘They won’t know what hit them.’ Unfortunately, Pakistan does not know what has hit them.

The author is a retired Major General of the Indian Army. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost’s views.